Recent Major Briefs
- June 5, 2012, State of Vermont Brief in the Second Circuit (Yankee)
- September 26, 2011, Vermont Post Trial Memo
- September 26, 2011, Entergy Post Trial Memo
- July 18, 2011, Memorandum and Order on Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
- June 13, 2011, Amicus brief of Commonwealth of Mass.
- June 13, 2011, Vermont Proposed Sur-reply to Entergy Reply
-
Recent Posts
Related Links
Tag Archives: Vermont Yankee lawsuit
Sept. 28, 2011, Don Kreis: Searching for Your Friends at the Vermont Yankee Cocktail Party
A long time ago, during a job interview when I was a law student, the chief justice of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court asked me where I saw myself in 10 years. “Chairman of the Maine Public Utilities Commission,” I … Continue reading
Posted in By Date, Don Kreis
Tagged Chairman Volz, Entergy, Kreis, Vermont Yankee lawsuit
Comments Off on Sept. 28, 2011, Don Kreis: Searching for Your Friends at the Vermont Yankee Cocktail Party
Sept. 16, 2011, Cheryl Hanna: Agreeing with Pat (sort of, but don’t tell him that)
Thanks, Pat, for that post on the meaning of Judge Murtha’s questions. I have to agree with you that the judge’s interest at the end of the trial, particularly about Entergy’s possible waiver and estoppel claims, was both surprising given … Continue reading
Posted in By Date, Cheryl Hanna
Tagged Entergy, Hanna, Pat Parenteau, Vermont Yankee lawsuit
Comments Off on Sept. 16, 2011, Cheryl Hanna: Agreeing with Pat (sort of, but don’t tell him that)
Sept. 16, 2011, Pat Parenteau: The Meaning of Judge Murtha’s Questions
At the close of the trial on Wednesday, Judge Murtha paid obligatory compliments to the lawyers for both sides and then posed a series of provocative questions that must be addressed in post-trial briefs (as if he wasn’t already buried … Continue reading
Posted in By Date, Pat Parenteau
Tagged Entergy, Pat Parenteau, Vermont Yankee, Vermont Yankee lawsuit
Comments Off on Sept. 16, 2011, Pat Parenteau: The Meaning of Judge Murtha’s Questions
Sept. 13, 2011, Cheryl Hanna: Further Thoughts on the Trial
Neither Professor Parenteau nor I were able to attend the trial today. And it is a bummer that I can’t attend Wednesday either because I would love to see Entergy attorney Kathleen Sullivan’s closing argument. Trust me, the federal courthouse … Continue reading
Posted in By Date, Cheryl Hanna
Tagged Constitutional law, Entergy, Hanna, Vermont Yankee lawsuit
Comments Off on Sept. 13, 2011, Cheryl Hanna: Further Thoughts on the Trial
Sept. 12, 2011, LIVE POST FROM TRIAL: The Longest Afternoon in Courtroom History
Entergy rested after a few brief depositions were admitted, and then the State put on it first witness, Bill Steinhurst, who has been involved with VT energy policy for more than two decades. It took the state 90 minutes to … Continue reading
Posted in By Date, Cheryl Hanna
Tagged Department of Public Service, Entergy, Hanna, Vermont Yankee lawsuit
Comments Off on Sept. 12, 2011, LIVE POST FROM TRIAL: The Longest Afternoon in Courtroom History
Aug. 5, 2011, Don Kreis: A Ptolemaic Policy Pronouncement from Peter Shumlin?
Editor Anne Galloway of the news web site VTDigger.org recently spent a long day driving around the state with Gov. Shumlin. Among her conclusions after 13 hours of meeting and greeting is that the former state Senate leader has changed … Continue reading
Posted in By Date, Don Kreis
Tagged Entergy, Gov. Shumlin, Vermont Yankee lawsuit
Comments Off on Aug. 5, 2011, Don Kreis: A Ptolemaic Policy Pronouncement from Peter Shumlin?
July 19, 2011, Pat Parenteau: Calling Entergy’s Bluff
At the close of the preliminary injunction hearing on June 23, Entergy attorney Kathleen Sullivan gravely warned Judge Murtha that the company might have to close Vermont Yankee early unless he granted the preliminary injunction. Judge Murtha didn’t blink. In … Continue reading
Posted in By Date, Pat Parenteau
Tagged Department of Public Service, Entergy, Pat Parenteau, Vermont Yankee lawsuit
Comments Off on July 19, 2011, Pat Parenteau: Calling Entergy’s Bluff
July 19, 2011, Cheryl Hanna: Preliminary Injunction Redux: Read the Footnotes
When my students first begin to study law, they have a tendency to focus on the holding of the case, such as “Preliminary Injunction Denied.” It’s like reading the headlines in a newspaper. But any good lawyer knows that the … Continue reading
July 19, 2011, Don Kreis: Entergy Wins by Losing on Temporary Injunction
Monday’s much anticipated decision by U.S. District Judge J. Garvan Murtha, denying Entergy’s request for a temporary injunction to keep Vermont Yankee open, contains something for everyone and is, thus, capable of many interpretations. One worth considering is the possibility … Continue reading
July 18, 2011, Cheryl Hanna: Interesting Article on Conflict Preemption on SCOTUS BLOG
While we all await Judge Murtha’s ruling in the preliminary injunction on the Vermont Yankee lawsuit—really, what is taking so long?—I thought our readers might be interested in the following post on Arizona v. United States: on SCOTUS blog: http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/07/arizona-v-united-states-narrowing-%E2%80%9Cprevent-or-frustrate%E2%80%9D-conflict-preemption/ … Continue reading
Posted in By Date, Cheryl Hanna
Tagged Constitutional law, Entergy, Hanna, immigration, Vermont Yankee lawsuit
2 Comments