Just on a break. Started with opening arguments. Sullivan was brilliant and I couldn’t help but think how all those years in a classroom make a big difference in being clear. Main points were that the legislative record doesn’t support non-safety reasons and even if there were other reasons, and even if not pretext, those reasons are implausible. In contrast, state argued Entergy didn’t abide by its end of the deal. A good story but less legally precise or persuasive.
Testimony has now begun. Stay tuned.
